AF Blog

 
divider
January 14, 2013 ← Return
 
Is That So?

Is That So?

The proliferation of communications media continues to cascade down upon us like a torrential rainstorm of books, magazines, TV programs, web pages, blogs, text messages, music, and videos. The Internet has redefined how we access information and now anyone with a computer may find answers to just about any question you might ask! But do all reports weigh truth accurately?

For instance, www.space.com recently posted an article called, “How Was Earth Formed.” Notice how it begins:

“There are two theories as to how planets in the solar system were created. The first and most widely accepted, core accretion, works well with the formation of the terrestrial planets like Earth but has problems with giant planets. The second, the disk instability method, may account for the creation of giant planets. Scientists are continuing to study planets in and out of the solar system in an effort to better understand which of these methods is most accurate.” [1]

It is important to note the word “theories” in the above paragraph. Sometimes those outside the scientific community accept statements in the news as de facto. After all, isn’t every “new scientific discovery” a reality? Perhaps we should pause and consider the word used above. More accurately, a theory is “a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation” or “an unproved assumption.” [2] Too often we take conjectures and turn them into factual truths.

Notice how the article continues: “Approximately 4.6 billion years ago, the solar system was a cloud of dust and gas known as a solar nebula. Gravity collapsed the material in on itself as it began to spin, forming the sun in the center of the nebula.” [3] If we are not careful to remember this is a proposed “model” for trying to understand the formation of planets, we might believe that there really are only two theories to explain the formation of our solar system.

Another theory, completely overlooked by this article and many scientists, is that, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1 NKJV). The growing evidence for a creation-model by a master designer in a short period of time continues to gain traction among scientists and other seekers. In reality, both creation and evolution are models that must be taken by faith. Both are theories that are built on assumptions. Creation assumes the Bible is a source of truth and that there is a God. Evolution assumes the Bible is not the source of all truth and that there is no God.

The next time you step into a blizzard of articles that “prove” evolution to be factual, think again. Pause and reflect on the evidence for different propositions for how the Earth was formed or how people came to be. A genuine search for truth looks at all sides of an issue. Have you honestly considered what the Scriptures say happened in the beginning?

[1] http://www.space.com/19175-how-was-earth-formed.html
[2] (“theory.” Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary: Eleventh Edition, 2003).
[3] http://www.space.com/19175-how-was-earth-formed.html

Amazing Facts is a non-profit, donor-supported ministry.
We greatly appreciate your prayers and financial support.

Support Amazing Facts


← Return

COMMENTS
NOTE: If you have a Bible question please submit it here. We cannot guarantee answers to Bible questions posted in the comments.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Explore our free book library

Tell Us Your Story!

Changed Lives

God's promises to you!

Featured Media
Amazing Facts Presents
God's people were not ready the first time He came, could it happen again?
Free Online Book Library
Find the power to be victorious when faced with temptation.

New in the Media Library!
Study Guides (Norwegian)
Bibelen sier at det er bare en kropp, eller menighet, som Jesus kaller sitt endetidsfolk inn i – Kristi brud. Dette gjør at noen blir nervøs ettersom der er tusenvis av forskjellige kirker som i dag kaller seg selv kristne. I realiteten hevder de alle å være Guds sanne menighet, selv om de alle varierer stort i bibelsk fortolkning, tro og praksis.
Amazing Facts Presents
Do the dead communicate with the living?
Book Library (Portuguese)
A falsificação mais perigosa é aquela que mais se assemelha à verdade. É por isso que as falsificações religiosas são tão mortais, embora frequentemente toleradas ao invés de serem identificadas e expostas.








           

About Us
Our Story
We Believe
About Pastor Doug
Our Other Websites
Contact Us
Employment
Volunteer Opportunities
News and Features
News
From Pastor Doug
Inside Report
Bible Prophecy Seminars
Changed Lives
Email Newsletter
Broadcast
Media Library
Station Locator
AFTV

Bible Study
Enroll Online
Bible Study Guides
Storacle Lessons
Free Online Book Library

Training
AFCOE
AFCOE To Go
Empowered Church

AFBookstore
New Releases
Sign up for Email Specials

DONATE NOW
Donate Now
Donate by Program
Donate by Project
Latest Opportunity
Estate Gift
My Account
(916) 434-3880   |    Site Map   |    AF iTools   |    Privacy Statement   |    Terms of Use
Copyright 2012 by Amazing Facts Inc.   |           Amazing Facts